my experiences of testbeds (arpanet, satnet, dartnet, planetlab, onelab, umbrella, gini, etc etc) is that it isn't so much the technology and budget, but the cohort of people engaged that mark out a testbed for success or failure or damp squib.
but that's just my experience - what do other people say?
but that's just my experience - what do other people say?
2 comments:
Exactly my impression (speaking mostly as an outsider)
I didn't understand you are you trying to say.
Post a Comment